Skip to main content
TOOLS

Shipper ROI Calculator

An illustrative mixed-fleet model for shippers, freight forwarders, and consignees who carry container deposit exposure — estimate your annual capital-at-risk and the illustrative share of repair charges you could recover with structured pickup-and-return evidence. Compare that range to your quoted ConPDS platform cost (pricing is scoped per deployment). Outputs are modelled from your inputs and public benchmarks, not a guaranteed result.

Enter your monthly dry, reefer, and ISO tank volumes, switch between CNEE port deposits and lessee equipment rental scenarios, and see the numbers update instantly. All math runs in your browser; raw calculator inputs are never sent to ConPDS.

CNEE & lessee scenarios in one place
Dry, reefer & ISO tank modelled side-by-side
In-browser · raw inputs stay private
Illustrative model — not a guaranteed outcome

The Financial Case for Structured Shipper Documentation

The cost of container deposit leakage scales with volume, deposit size, and the share of returns where a repair charge is raised on your specific lanes. The illustrative math below models what a structured documentation platform could recover at three operator sizes across both deposit scenarios: lessee-side (equipment rental, typically around two to three months' rental — a few hundred euros for a dry box) and CNEE-side (port collection — the larger per-container deposit, typically around €1,000 for a dry box, rising to €2,500+ in some regions on the most contested lanes and materially higher for reefer and ISO tank). These are modelled estimates, not guaranteed outcomes. Switch scenarios below to see tier figures at each baseline, or use the interactive calculator further down to model your own fleet.

Deposit scenario:
Toggles assumptions, tier figures and calculator defaults together.
Illustrative model assumptions (Lessee / equipment rental scenario): €300 illustrative lessee deposit per dry container (reefer ~€1,000, ISO tank ~€500 — see class table below) · lessee deposits are often sized at roughly 2–3 months rental in ConPDS customer-reported practice · 20% of returns modelled as resulting in a repair charge being raised (operator-reported planning range: 15–25% on high-dispute lanes) · raised charges capped at the lower of actual repair cost or deposit value · 60–80% illustrative recovery planning band when condition is documented at pickup — not a ConPDS outcome guarantee · Figures are modelled estimates, not guaranteed savings — financially strong counterparties often pay no deposit at all.
Mid Operator

40 containers / month

Deposit capital circulating€144,000
Annual repair-charge exposure€28,800
Recoverable (illustrative 60–80% band)€17,280–€23,040
Platform costScoped per deployment
Payback: compare the illustrative recoverable range to your quoted annual platform cost — ConPDS pricing is scoped per deployment, not a published list price.
Large Operator

150 containers / month

Deposit capital circulating€540,000
Annual repair-charge exposure€108,000
Recoverable (illustrative 60–80% band)€64,800–€86,400
Platform costScoped per deployment
Payback: compare the illustrative recoverable range to your quoted annual platform cost — ConPDS pricing is scoped per deployment, not a published list price.
Enterprise

500 containers / month

Deposit capital circulating€1,800,000
Annual repair-charge exposure€360,000
Recoverable (illustrative 60–80% band)€216,000–€288,000
Platform costScoped per deployment
Payback: compare the illustrative recoverable range to your quoted annual platform cost — ConPDS pricing is scoped per deployment, not a published list price.
ConPDS Checker Pricing
Scoped per deployment
Facility count, user count, and photo volume determine the written estimate · No hardware required · Onboarding support included · Book a scoping call for a quote
Different Equipment · Different Deposit Scenarios · Same Evidence Need

Deposit Exposure Varies by Class and Scenario

Each class below shows typical deposit ranges on both sides of the deposit split. CNEE-side (port collection) is typically the higher, scaling with container replacement value and non-return risk; lessee-side (equipment rental) is typically the lower, sized at roughly 2–3 months rental. Mixed-fleet operators carry compounding exposure: a single contested reefer compressor claim or ISO tank cleaning dispute often exceeds the annual platform cost on its own.

Dry Box

CNEE deposit€100–€2,500+
Lessee deposit€0–€500
Typical repair range€100–€2,000
Common dispute pointsdents, corner posts, flooring, door seals

Reefer

CNEE deposit€1,500–€7,500
Lessee deposit€300–€1,500
Typical repair range€500–€8,000+
Common dispute pointscompressor, evaporator, controller, cosmetic damage

ISO Tank

CNEE deposit€2,000–€12,000
Lessee deposit€0–€1,500
Typical repair range€500–€15,000
Common dispute pointsvalves, manlid, cleaning, heating coils, frame

Deposit sizes vary widely on both sides — financially strong counterparties often pay no deposit at all, while new or small operators on high-dispute lanes pay the upper end of each range. The calculator below lets you model your actual fleet against either deposit scenario.

Calculate Your Own Mixed-Fleet Exposure

Enter your monthly container volumes and known average repair charges. The calculator models your annual deposit exposure and an illustrative recoverable range once handover and return condition evidence is in place — all computed in your browser. Compare that range to your quoted ConPDS platform cost (pricing is scoped per deployment). Your typed values are not transmitted; if you accept analytics cookies, ConPDS receives only anonymous usage buckets such as scenario, volume range, and exposure range.

Deposit scenario:
Toggle resets deposit and repair defaults. Your volume inputs are preserved.
Dry Box
Reefer
ISO Tank
%
In high-dispute lanes, roughly 15–25% of returns result in a repair charge being applied at the shipper's cost.
Your Annual Exposure & Recovery Potential
Annual deposit capital
Yearly exposure to repair charges
Recoverable (illustrative 60% band)
Recoverable (illustrative 80% band)
Illustrative payback vs €4,200/year planning cost

Planning-cost comparator only — not published ConPDS list pricing. Replace with your quoted annual cost when you have a written estimate.

How this is calculated
  • Annual deposit capital: Σ (monthly volume × deposit per container) × 12 — the working capital tied up in deposits at any given time.
  • Annual repair-charge exposure: Σ (monthly volume × avg charge when raised) × incidence rate × 12 — the expected €'s absorbed as repair deductions across a year.
  • Recoverable (illustrative 60–80% band): exposure × 60% to 80% — a planning assumption for modelling, not a ConPDS customer outcome guarantee or published recovery rate.
  • Illustrative payback multiple: recoverable ÷ €4,200/year planning comparator. ConPDS Checker pricing is scoped per deployment; use your written estimate in place of this floor when comparing.

Incidence rate is the share of returns where any repair charge is raised — not a percentage of the deposit that gets deducted. If 100% of your returns incur a charge, set this to 100%. The avg charge when raised is the average only across containers that actually get charged, not across all returns.

Where these assumptions come from
  • Deposit ranges: illustrative planning anchors informed by published shipping-line import tariffs and industry practice. The model's €1,000 dry-box CNEE and €300 lessee defaults are conservative starting points — edit the inputs to match your lanes. Authoritative primary citations for specific tariff sheets remain pending registry verification.
  • Lessee deposit sizing: lease terms are negotiated case-by-case on lessee creditworthiness. The "2–3 months rental" sizing is the convention ConPDS customers report — not a universal lessor rule.
  • Incidence rate (15–25%): operator-reported planning range; directionally consistent with a TCompanies US intermodal survey estimating ~25% of containers and trailers in circulation are damaged, with 39% of carriers billed even when not at fault (FreightWaves coverage — see source ledger).
  • Average repair charge: editable defaults by container class — replace with your actual average when known.
  • Recovery band (60–80%): illustrative planning assumption retained as a modelling input (owner-approved 2026-08-05) — not a ConPDS customer outcome or published recovery rate. In the TCompanies survey reported by FreightWaves, 61% of not-at-fault charges were paid because the payer could not prove they weren't responsible — supporting the case for structured evidence, not a ConPDS recovery rate.
  • Pricing: ConPDS Checker pricing is scoped per deployment. The €4,200/year figure in the payback line is a planning comparator only, not a published list price.

All figures are illustrative, operator-typical estimates based on your inputs and public benchmarks — not guaranteed savings. Actual recovery depends on lane mix, counterparty, and evidence quality. Calculated in-browser; raw calculator inputs are never sent to ConPDS.

Who This Calculator Is For

This calculator is framed for operators who carry container deposit exposure at pickup and return — the shipper, forwarder, or consignee side of the trade. It is deliberately narrow so the inputs and assumptions stay honest. If your exposure looks different (depot gate throughput, reefer workshop M&R, wash-station turn), the right place to start is the relevant product page rather than forcing your numbers through this model.

Best fit
Freight forwarders and logistics operators managing shipper-owned deposit exposure on lanes where disputes are routine
Shippers and consignees paying CNEE-side port deposits who need an independent condition baseline at handover
Shippers and forwarders paying lessee-side deposits on rented equipment — particularly reefer and ISO tank, where per-container exposure is materially higher
NVOCCs and SOC container operators who own or lease the boxes and bear the full repair cost at return
Mixed-fleet operators moving dry boxes, reefers, and ISO tank containers — where higher-deposit equipment carries proportionally higher leakage risk

Want the Numbers Translated Into an Implementation Plan?

If the illustrative recovery range above looks material for your fleet, the next step is a short conversation about how a structured pickup-and-return record is deployed at your lane profile, counterparty mix, and existing evidence tooling. No pitch deck — the ConPDS team walks through the evidence standard, the rollout, and the honest edge cases where actual recovery falls outside the modelled 60–80% range. The 60–80% figure is a planning assumption, not a guaranteed recovery rate.

No obligations — reply within 1 business day · Raw calculator inputs are never sent to ConPDS unless you choose to share them.